Return-Path: <skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.022
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '"this': 0.03; 'indicated': 0.07; 'postfix': 0.07; 'responsive': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'archive': 0.14; 'mostly': 0.14; 'changes': 0.15; "deleted'": 0.16; 'placeholder': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'folks': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'skip': 0.24; 'earlier': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'generally': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'closer': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'message.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'entire': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'articles': 0.65; 'carefully': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:here': 0.84; 'touching': 0.84; 'cutting': 0.91; 'response,': 0.91; 'task,': 0.91; 'archive.': 0.93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=aydoU6LENuzU5ongDQdLkehQ7F4NKTs5hZ5vAHUN3Cs=; b=ItfF0UAQDoIcOfVaTQ9VLAbOY+Kbk2A2WofoteZ2TvFZM6pTMW+T78BFq3km5jbvmq Mx/4zb+wlybcYtG9OHyZ0N8H49Tfn8QNemiwZDaaGRiUxqrfRqW/NzSC1QQcnk2YAnrV TojGkNANoTdsA5psI/LYgfwP3pRX6qJAmgSCLiP+Qveb7tAqfWzGHKI19BnvlOiIo/uv XEMGeOo9tkQXCBS28S5RS6nvK7SFAM3Gh/duLZrqlUsnoiF5SizsZ0ngDgSF1O/f5Qlx pyssu7GA2p7d8aDmWiFhybyFHsIJEPCSSsEhFbgCmMPUHZ5sOyiAXZ8rZE8LD5kqxG2R EkqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.92.5 with SMTP id ci5mr12294725oeb.26.1420898273158; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:57:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m8qs58$g3t$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <54afb3ed$0$12995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CANc-5UztJsV20dRCpLs5oVrDjr131p8afV5Mp_SwFq2OihKwyQ@mail.gmail.com> <m8qs58$g3t$2@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:57:53 -0600
Subject: Re: Why do the URLs of posts here change?
From: Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
To: Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.17564.1420898282.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1420898282 news.xs4all.nl 2924 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55290
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!bete-des-vosges.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:83501

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> The post could be replaced by a placeholder "This message deleted'
>
>  and the
>>
>> archive regenerated. That changes the counter for every message after
>
>
> A placeholder should avoid that.

I suspect (though don't know for certain) that just regenerating the
archive without touching the mbox file will change the numbering.
Steven's original post mentioned two very different basenames (468598
and 481374). As I indicated in an earlier response, those might be
generated from an ever-growing counter, not just a shift as articles
slide one closer to the first one of the month.

So, you'd have to edit the mbox file carefully (might need to edit
headers) and also edit the generated HTML for the message. Neither is
an insurmountable task, but both are going to be more error-prone than
just cutting out an entire message and regenerating the archive.

I will pass along your suggestion to the postmaster folks (I don't get
involved that that level - it's mostly the folks who directly maintain
the Postfix setup who do this), though. They are a generally pretty
responsive bunch.

Skip