Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'nasty': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'assumed': 0.09; 'command.': 0.09; '-name': 0.16; '.py': 0.16; 'make,': 0.16; 'meanwhile,': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'sorts': 0.16; 'subject:possible': 0.16; 'xargs': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'fairly': 0.21; 'seems': 0.23; 'project,': 0.24; 'command': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'leave': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'bugs': 0.27; 'tree': 0.27; 'run': 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'source': 0.29; 'file': 0.32; 'not.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'moved': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'depends': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'our': 0.65; 'received:74.208': 0.71; 'smith': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'received:74.208.4.194': 0.84 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:33:35 -0500 From: Dave Angel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python Makefiles... are they possible? References: <511b2a7c$0$11096$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: <511b2a7c$0$11096$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:BrzVgnlwABOCps6JgLhxQZnso5sjToAvRwGdCCiiNbr uq9dPi7g3SXF+iWk2gSTa6kbuIpE5o8EBqz2mTenoO3EnEteVJ 22IiobFOPcsjwMSrfvv16hNXYQY+lxxIIgvGXorURwmjWmb91n vP6Zl7LskAZwaXXhRW6raPFCCnCHOtAii1tRc8OEe1mX1B9un7 vcrP7PzjxY3tO4ee9MGINjI4CXX2DhnK++2hb3A8rJIjDCRDBt cbhQGotsL20Ps9trgSIf+4NmNbSsjnKR5xThkAHF2mni9R/VfS sAOW+7wBEBfQtMfbMH8nAeohn0p5IxYfeEb2kUG5V6M9ha37A= = X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1360762432 news.xs4all.nl 6965 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46472 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:38816 On 02/13/2013 12:54 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:06:35 -0500, Roy Smith wrote: > >> One thing we do in our Makefiles is "find . -name '*.pyc' | xargs rm". >> It avoids all sorts of nasty and hard to track down bugs (consider what >> happens if you move a .py file from one place in your source tree to >> another and leave the old .pyc behind). > > > How often do you move files around in the source tree? Meanwhile, *every* > time you run make, you take a performance hit on every Python module in > your project, whether it has moved or not. > > Seems to me like a fairly heavy-handed response for something quite rare, > but I suppose that depends on how often you run make. > > > > That's why I assumed that his command was triggered by the "make clean" command. -- DaveA