Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.083 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.01; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'interpreted': 0.07; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '"you': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'johnson': 0.32; 'word.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'more': 0.63; 'felt': 0.75; '(oh': 0.84; 'rick': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:18:17 -0700 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Awsome Python - chained exceptions References: <5119de00$0$11096$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <1bc6cf63-9219-4798-ae01-dfe9643d96b4@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1bc6cf63-9219-4798-ae01-dfe9643d96b4@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 8 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1360729110 news.xs4all.nl 6874 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37635 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:38804 On 02/12/2013 07:47 PM, Rick Johnson wrote: > ...Oh Steven, if you only knew how we interpreted the "Oops!", more like "Doh!". ^^^^ "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." > Got any more bright ideas DeAprano? (Oh gawd that felt good!) Ummm...