Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'restriction': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'library': 0.15; 'from:addr:behnel.de': 0.16; 'from:addr:stefan_ml': 0.16; 'from:name:stefan behnel': 0.16; 'ironpython': 0.16; 'message-id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'nevertheless': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'stefan': 0.17; 'obviously': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'code,': 0.18; 'software.': 0.21; 'dropped': 0.22; 'subject:will': 0.22; 'project,': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'integrate': 0.27; 'library.': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'changed.': 0.29; 'dan': 0.29; 'subject:last': 0.30; 'received:84': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'that,': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'free': 0.61; 'thomas': 0.62; 'jul': 0.65; 'url:main': 0.65; 'cultural': 0.71; 'received:arcor-ip.net': 0.84; 'received:pools.arcor- ip.net': 0.84; 'url:27': 0.84; 'url:master': 0.84; 'have.': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Stefan Behnel Subject: Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:37:01 +0200 References: <339f28b0-1305-43b9-b2b1-02e332bc80e3@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <4FF09DE3.9020808@jollybox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-056-003-004.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1341254239 news.xs4all.nl 6975 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42577 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:24784 Dan Stromberg, 01.07.2012 21:28: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote: >> On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: >>> IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library. >> >> Beg pardon? >> >> https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib > > Perhaps things have changed. Yes, they have. The original restriction came from Microsoft enforcing a clean-room implementation for their code, which obviously excluded the standard library - which is well tested and licence cleared and all that, but nevertheless non-MS. When they dropped the IronPython project, it became free to integrate with other software. Clearly a cultural thing. Stefan