Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ian Kelly Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Quick poll: gmean or geometric_mean Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:15:59 -0600 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <57808af6$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57820c7a$0$1617$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57821eaa$0$1584$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <1014e463-20b0-446f-96f6-c142587f4b82@googlegroups.com> <87r3b11qnq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de yRFsFDbvS+1ZR6b4mzg7vAdXXrFqL2SkUtj3l58+2xjA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.129 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.75; '*S*': 0.01; 'implies': 0.09; 'units,': 0.09; 'variables': 0.15; '"g"': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'verbose': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.16; "shouldn't": 0.18; 'names.': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'demonstrate': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'example': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'point': 0.33; 'usually': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'necessary.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'associated': 0.38; 'no,': 0.38; 'names': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'avoid': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'strategy': 0.69; 'jul': 0.72; 'descriptive': 0.84; 'standards.': 0.84; 'subject:Quick': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84; 'ymmv.': 0.84; 'excessive': 0.91; 'subject:skip:g 10': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/MMg5oq2aq47802n6/yedtnbZxzFCDgkmH9cqs+ExD0=; b=KWR/9SJgsmcfRzm9xhk/s/tJ8sj3w/S8w2hlmkYchtCto6IlxUejHRdqSQWGCSpowG LcvCkRZGKhKFFXPjo9h3t5bfWuxgWFUClvBR1stfZhc4pkvW/ajKVLIbrQ3APX1jU375 hwrrB2hnHvKP9q1a+SXOhVMYnHEtVRbOtsWn4QdXxu4kd93oMkvMpl7FJIguIDZig7jT 0Os5MT4SIqDv5ESDRVxLjV8HxNYsF2ExgTV9k68EHmGVrrU1kBBtIke4GibxlS2lSfX6 Goq8P4UaiGCrnFEm0WJZNL7NsTuAVcdh9BDt/vqiwkrV9KGj/mDOswsgyEgyWiZc6659 B//w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/MMg5oq2aq47802n6/yedtnbZxzFCDgkmH9cqs+ExD0=; b=SetWevLWSABmnur637zqc6JnFCi65rlbToW5iEbNp/eJ7fBMcZ8gF4P6GageuCn3sX adXAMv+3XIOOhhSaHaCx/u2BrHi++zsB1QqDF/Gq0s0VgSnS22DJPNSM11HMXkr4ROO4 uxE4NBUpW9zwWU+uDiK5RAaHVPjYJREI5T/oy5t8TdbvunFMAbUX2rAcZ99Av7E8yfOc +/C9/9NREKSr93SA0t+z/Ufy7TgtwJAkjMxpqEY2JNSnQ6lSnbS25C9gO8gXi9w65v5G Z7JTrS5/QOHVokgjvXezA48fDBH5+z/hEwwlVmP6TVglqm32brFI0De3lva35oJMJbLa R4rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKnIU/uTizWSH0wkclBQSdEeO7PTGIzO9G9YOFKbjjHeB2WpJv14nr22+GpnN2C4FTiwbEHz3U/VkBMSw== X-Received: by 10.202.181.137 with SMTP id e131mr8408336oif.144.1468170998837; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3b11qnq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <57808af6$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57820c7a$0$1617$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57821eaa$0$1584$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <1014e463-20b0-446f-96f6-c142587f4b82@googlegroups.com> <87r3b11qnq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111254 On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Ian Kelly : > >> That's still excessive by any reasonable standards. Names should be >> descriptive, but no more verbose than necessary. How about: >> >> force_N = -G * mass1_kg * mass2_kg / distance_m ** 2 > > Why bother with tagging the names with standard units? The point of the example was to demonstrate descriptive names. For local variables I usually wouldn't bother with the units, but in general it's a good practice to help avoid crashing your orbiter into Mars. > Shouldn't it be G_N_m2_per_kg2, given your strategy for identifying the > units associated with the other variables? To me, the use of the standard name implies standard units, so no, "G" is sufficient. YMMV.