Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'subject:both': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'useful,': 0.13; "hasn't": 0.15; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'developer': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'creating': 0.30; 'compiled': 0.32; 'generally': 0.32; 'but': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'really': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'programs': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'useful.': 0.72; 'received:12': 0.81; 'rubbish': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Emile van Sebille Subject: Re: Why Python is not both an interpreter and a compiler? Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:56:01 -0700 References: <3e541d13-bc86-456c-8590-4ffd1af9cfd0@googlegroups.com> <87twrftw4w.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.westernstatesglass.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1441043774 news.xs4all.nl 23721 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56006 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:95794 On 8/31/2015 10:48 AM, Mahan Marwat wrote: >> Python programs *could* easily be compiled the same way, but it generally >> hasn't been considered all that useful. > > If it hasn't been considered all that useful, then why the tools like cx_freeze, pytoexe are doing very hard! People scratching their own itch. > And if it is really easy, then why cx_freeze, pytoexe developer are doing it in such a rubbish way instead of creating one (compiler)? You'd have to ask them. Emile