Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Refactoring in a large code base Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:09:27 +1100 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <87bn8ec90z.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <93ffa9a5-b245-414e-b255-7f182e22e799@googlegroups.com> <874me5digp.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87zivxbzj6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87r3h9bwg3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87io2lbu91.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de jMHUqaXvN6wof1W54zgCWwMc6sj3kQq0xcwTHEW+5cSQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'definitions': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'components.': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; 'ignore': 0.14; '2016': 0.16; '23,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; "aren't": 0.22; 'cycles': 0.22; 'releasing': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'code.': 0.23; 'fit': 0.23; 'sat,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'chris': 0.26; 'figure': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; 'boundaries': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'propose': 0.35; 'step': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'release': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'share': 0.61; 'bring': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'within': 0.64; 'between': 0.65; 'started.': 0.66; 'you:': 0.79; 'beats': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'subject:base': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=XsvAk5I3IVAUA8JuWV3ksFqRIq8ZD48f0IZ0yquHMWo=; b=uUVyTvvdhVgkBrqIvSigzviruIcdB87tBVOX4MwIpoMhTJmXwcfCeqdkB+OeZSdmXs jXIOtrTp+EgGx/ok8p9EJ/UVtMI/GOKYRoAb5FZiMVvOV+lJ4EQ9gMrmLTKqq+w9i40t 2b+e50mOZRJ3/tS9EJUTFf0Pzg9q4isyJhO1qH2TbaW3Wfmd72pCE6Xr1HJcL3XZ4Wea XBBTyHluXoK0gB8VS0yaNOgbd+gbFur1bqOpvgvekLtPIn9tDfgkV3+JjTcHcl0BXXom dZ5dME3XXg9kg6hXLPzf8BWMSl/qPSv8uTEOQmPgaSRNlYDl83Qr0MxXzxGDkXWAVrRw SZcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=XsvAk5I3IVAUA8JuWV3ksFqRIq8ZD48f0IZ0yquHMWo=; b=AvI1x+MVb22KFfTqEe99ef4BzGl1L/kYQ/KrvxFrvWotzviMc0KKr/NWIzIhEt0KHz K1YS+L9DYNIt1Jum0a8lmGAQBASFri1+cixjtsummS5hzjvk0bv0oU1OfVzQUXnKH5Ms XKtFVwHL034QKPGXa5+9lETNTSCXubifJL6Kaqf4p24dTHwP3eQBIJu39NhbdwFNmwFs 4foM1dHXAJ1nyevo8hgTfp5gzo0t8gm5qtYtNwxbWfqAyxbsuOoXA6hgt3zNYKGpIVys 1UDnRmdv5UVQm7q3nWlDXKs1bOTeWGclow89MSMqqhbbisGHj88WdfiWoB2bEr8bHooc r5YA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQDSFyMhzYlp0CwolWCnxWVihfKN8EGFYzoMz3xfQmxFvg2Ket5O+FrkW2HNBDFSUvD2iXMHZKbuiKzpg== X-Received: by 10.50.70.38 with SMTP id j6mr3757897igu.13.1453471767559; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:09:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87io2lbu91.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:102017 On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Chris Angelico : > >> Okay. Start persuading "management" (presumably the PSU) that CPython >> needs to be more modular, with different release cycles for different >> components. Your first step is to figure out the boundaries between >> those components. Get started. > > Gladly, I don't need to do anything about CPython. This particular > strawman was erected by you: > >> CPython is a large and complex program. How do you propose doing it >> "right"? > > It's up to you to take my proposal or ignore it. > > However, I have had my share of windmills to battle; I'm happy to say > I've managed to bring down a few of them! Okay. You have fun releasing nothing that you aren't confident can fit within your definitions (and by the way, you were the one who brought up the three-month rewrite, not me); I'm going to keep on following the principle that "practicality beats purity", and release actual working code. ChrisA