Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.029 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'subject:search': 0.07; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'except:': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'send()': 0.16; 'long,': 0.16; 'method.': 0.19; 'occurred': 0.19; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'work,': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.22; 'file,': 0.22; 'itself.': 0.22; 'loop': 0.22; 'received:209.85.213': 0.23; 'calling': 0.25; 'guess': 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; "won't": 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; '17,': 0.31; 'carl': 0.31; 'yourself.': 0.33; 'break': 0.33; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'like:': 0.35; 'try:': 0.35; 'usually': 0.36; 'none': 0.36; 'case': 0.37; 'should': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'feels': 0.38; 'sequence': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'provider': 0.39; 'could': 0.39; 'comes': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'except': 0.39; 'might': 0.40; 'back': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.69; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.72; 'hand.': 0.84; 'reply- to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.93 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:30:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=157.127.155.214; posting-account=XFEWnwoAAADNO10m3Wcmq_SWdmyZuXff User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: in search of graceful co-routines From: Carl Banks To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Python List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1305653427 news.xs4all.nl 49184 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:39063 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5586 On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:04:25 AM UTC-7, Chris Withers wrote: > Now, since the sequence is long, and comes from a file, I wanted the > provider to be an iterator, so it occurred to me I could try and use the > new 2-way generator communication to solve the "communicate back with > the provider", with something like: > > for item in provider: > try: > consumer.handleItem(self) > except: > provider.send('fail') > else: > provider.send('succeed') > > ..but of course, this won't work, as 'send' causes the provider > iteration to continue and then returns a value itself. That feels weird > and wrong to me, but I guess my use case might not be what was intended > for the send method. You just have to call send() in a loop yourself. Note that you should usually catch StopIteration whenever calling send() or next() by hand. Untested: result = None while True: try: item = provider.send(result) except StopIteration: break try: consumer.handleItem(item) except: result = 'failure' else: result = 'success' Carl Banks