Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:184.172': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'subject:Does': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'do.': 0.18; 'meant': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'program,': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'agree': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'received:173': 0.61; 'skip:* 10': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'received:69.56': 0.68; 'received:69.56.148': 0.84
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:31:56 -0700
From: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Does Python 'enable' poke and hope programming?
References: <6b1769f8-222b-4953-99c8-a1d73cec3d60@googlegroups.com> <a4b05e37-ffa3-48ab-b49d-4a41b152b5e9@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4b05e37-ffa3-48ab-b49d-4a41b152b5e9@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:49230
X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.168.1375556201.1251.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1375556201 news.xs4all.nl 15909 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54620
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51879

On 08/03/2013 10:30 AM, CM wrote:
>
> But what I meant is that if one is writing a program, there is a way
>  to **know**--without experimentation--what a particular set of code
>  is going to do.

Even when you /know/, experimenting is still good for two other purposes:

   - check that what you know is so

   - check that the interpreter behaves consistently with the docs

But yes, I otherwise agree with you.

--
~Ethan~