Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'output': 0.04; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'sat,': 0.15; 'data...': 0.16; 'filled,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'subject:/': 0.28; 'delayed': 0.29; '+0200,': 0.33; 'url:home': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'problem,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'dennis': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dennis Lee Bieber Subject: Re: Reducing cache/buffer for faster display Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:12:14 -0400 Organization: > Bestiaria Support Staff < References: <2grhj9-ofn.ln1@murmur.very.softly> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-76-249-28-56.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 X-No-Archive: YES X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348942332 news.xs4all.nl 6873 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41557 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30519 On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:20:50 +0200, Rikishi42 declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > > Well, the \r seems to be the problem, allright. > But output was not completely blocked, just delayed a very long time. > Of course -- once the output buffer was filled, the system would output the data... -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/