Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.085 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.83; '*S*': 0.00; 'ok.': 0.04; 'api': 0.09; 'asyncore': 0.16; 'bugs,': 0.16; 'received:10.216': 0.16; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.16; 'archives': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'problem': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'cc:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.30; 'python3': 0.30; 'actually': 0.31; 'actual': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'received:209.85.212': 0.33; 'it?': 0.33; 'richard': 0.34; 'fundamental': 0.34; 'maintains': 0.34; 'comment': 0.36; 'cc:2**1': 0.36; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'enough': 0.38; 'uses': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'point': 0.40; 'header:Received:6': 0.61; 'design': 0.61; 'improve': 0.62; 'interest': 0.64; 'to:charset:iso-8859-1': 0.82; 'it"': 0.84; 'python-dev': 0.84 Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of richardbp@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.87 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.134.87; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of richardbp@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.87 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=richardbp@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=richardbp@gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VpEpb+gW/lURj2GpU4C6kHd7Qkf9A8Z+O85tGDWeJwc=; b=hEXSDuJXmIHnDkVPSTcHVf1XLBX0tma7JEAjypH1+7VrAuQCZfNJE2ku4vaUbOVB+I TXbbvwC+g6CMY4LRpSdVEsaAgkwfTKDraUh4nZiHWzbnuFkK5MnwGqFwhzxKTptdeAQF c8Os9poxa6MmNRQGm9p2GjWK/BW07veP9ZD+A= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <33089103.45.1329980290357.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbne2> <12104574.700.1330045825791.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcwj5> From: Richard Baron Penman Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:44:16 +1100 Subject: Re: asynchronous downloading To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Giampaolo_Rodol=E0?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org, comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1330206283 news.xs4all.nl 6900 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58870 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20868 >> I read through the python-dev archives and found the fundamental problem is no one maintains asnycore / asynchat. > > Well, actually I do/did. ah OK. I had read this comment from a few years back: "IIRC, there was a threat to remove asyncore because there were no maintainers, no one was fixing bugs, no one was improving it, and no one was really using it" > Point with asyncore/asynchat is that it's original design is so flawed > and simplicistic it doesn't allow actual customization without > breaking compatibility. Python3 uses the same API - was there not enough interest to improve it? Richard