Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.013
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; '(possibly': 0.09; 'gpl': 0.09; "person's": 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'written': 0.12; 'slightly': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'subject:python': 0.15; 'authors.': 0.16; 'glue': 0.16; 'served': 0.16; 'subject:distribution': 0.16; '16,': 0.16; 'possibly': 0.16; 'meant': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.20; 'work,': 0.20; 'appropriate': 0.21; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.22; 'purposes.': 0.23; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.23; 'received:mail- iw0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'subject:code': 0.23; 'unlikely': 0.23; "i'm": 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'house,': 0.29; 'nobody': 0.29; 'licenses': 0.29; 'steal': 0.31; 'does': 0.31; 'however,': 0.31; 'separate': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'project': 0.32; 'source': 0.32; 'agree': 0.32; "i've": 0.33; 'someone': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'open': 0.35; 'think': 0.36; 'else': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'exactly': 0.37; 'either': 0.37; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'user': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'them,': 0.38; 'unless': 0.38; 'it!': 0.39; 'larger': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'best': 0.60; 'give': 0.61; 'family': 0.62; 'huge': 0.62; '2011': 0.62; 'worth': 0.64; 'human': 0.64; 'afraid': 0.69; 'hey,': 0.74; 'worms': 0.84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=D8aSc7PAkt2SKj2thBJfs72nx4UatLcAJUWrNyrwxak=; b=NFp+y42ihd9LAKckYo4xWLDQ0oBhHmFgDJmiZ8pMcNd5+SUdfT/EUUAIKBnQaq8aJc hta78dcGOu41v8oXErxqadcMi2UyeadcM60mdW3cpzNjRmJkJUn8res+nTlhEU4lD+kR yECHpzxw5YHvU2tIIXERja82tjUpXt/UNY5Bc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=R+KDHpjv4aQErov/aU9NOLDO+PJxAu42aFWzSX2/4md1vg7WJzQSgeT09eGfvX1aG8 iAHixkkDRArrxKVqtLQw2XOnyxjBDQXIX6EPAzYWlk9YsdVTUoy7IURXOkJP5I0FBYzD ex4P8hm5LDtm9lZkrGWV9Fx3kFaSrrh3D2BSs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4dd0a1fc$0$29983$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References: <mailman.1609.1305511928.9059.python-list@python.org> <87boz3gw5u.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.1614.1305517027.9059.python-list@python.org> <4dd0a1fc$0$29983$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:40:17 +1000
Subject: Re: obviscating python code for distribution
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1619.1305520820.9059.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166
X-Trace: 1305520820 news.xs4all.nl 34849 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:51560
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5480

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> The best way to do that is to labour in obscurity, where nobody either
> knows or cares about your application. There are hundreds of thousands,
> possibly millions, of such applications, with a user base of one: the
> creator.

And I'm sure Steven will agree with me that this is not in any way a
bad thing. I've written hundreds of such programs myself (possibly
thousands), and they have all served their purposes. On a slightly
larger scale, there are even more programs that have never left the
walls of my house, having been written for my own family - not because
I'm afraid someone else will steal them, but because they simply are
of no value to anyone else. But hey, if anyone wants a copy of my code
that's basically glue between [obscure application #1] and [obscure
application #2] that does [obscure translation] as well to save a
human from having to do it afterwards, sure! You're welcome to it! :)

However, I do not GPL my code; I prefer some of the other licenses
(such as CC-BY-SA), unless I'm working on a huge project that's not
meant to have separate authors. For something that by and large is one
person's work, I think it's appropriate to give attribution. But
discussion of exactly _which_ open source license to use is a can of
worms that's unlikely to be worth opening at this stage.

Chris Angelico