Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: ASCII or Unicode? (was best text editor for programming Python on a Mac) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <242caeee-f489-4956-8261-680fe49f402d@googlegroups.com> <576747c1$0$1585$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57676318$0$1621$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de CqEdRgvc9TIJ2qXp+gvFAASy6SeqxwXQnuK35110WDdA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'configure': 0.04; 'subject:text': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'subject:editor': 0.07; 'works.': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:qwest.net': 0.09; 'xor': 0.09; 'language,': 0.11; 'subject: \n ': 0.15; '(last': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'result:': 0.16; 'subject:Mac': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'downtown': 0.22; 'logical': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'somewhere': 0.24; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'figure': 0.27; 'sequence': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'argue': 0.29; 'behaviour': 0.29; "i'd": 0.31; 'probably': 0.31; 'generally': 0.32; 'though,': 0.32; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'wrap': 0.33; 'done': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'done.': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'hand': 0.82; 'circle,': 0.84; 'compose': 0.84; 'horrible': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91; 'phil': 0.91; 'lot,': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <242caeee-f489-4956-8261-680fe49f402d@googlegroups.com> <576747c1$0$1585$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <57676318$0$1621$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:110202 On 2016-06-20, Phil Boutros wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >> Quote: >> >> "Why do we have to write x!=y then argue about the status of x<>y when we >> can simply write x≠y?" >> >> "Simply"? >> >> This is how I write x≠y from scratch: > > > To wrap this back full circle, here's how it's done on vim: > > Ctrl-K, =, ! (last two steps interchangeable). Done. Result: ≠ On any non-broken X11 system it's: = / I generally configure my system so that the right-hand "windows" key is . If I used it a lot, I'd probably configure the left hand one to be the same. > It's still probably a horrible idea to have it in a programming > language, though, unless the original behaviour still also works. Definitely. And we should allow overbar for logical inversion. I never did figure out the X11 compose sequence for the XOR symbol... -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Somewhere in DOWNTOWN at BURBANK a prostitute is gmail.com OVERCOOKING a LAMB CHOP!!