Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'arg': 0.09; 'comment,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.14; 'argument': 0.15; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'pass': 0.22; 'code.': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'skip:_ 10': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.34; 'changed': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:de': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'frank': 0.72; 'subject:via': 0.84; 'variation': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Argument Presence Checking via Identity or Boolean Operation? Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:28:45 +0200 Organization: None References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd9204.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1433410181 news.xs4all.nl 2859 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51710 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:92041 Frank Millman wrote: > I have a slight variation in that I want to keep a reference to the > argument - > > def __init__(self, arg=None): > self.arg = arg or [] > > Based on your comment, I have changed it to - > > def __init__(self, arg=None): > self.arg = [] if arg is None else arg > > Does this pass your 'stop and consider' test? Yes, that avoids the problem of the original code.