Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Serhiy Storchaka Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Stupid Python tricks Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:22:18 +0200 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <5684a63b$0$1595$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de mjMt7b2WBXAY+sPsYUb6KQ9NjFKzogNXwH1NG/F0UyJg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; "peters'": 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'tim': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'but': 0.36; 'faster': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; '10%': 0.72; 'obvious': 0.76; 'trick.': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.202.118.166 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 In-Reply-To: <5684a63b$0$1595$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101125 On 31.12.15 05:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Fifteen years later, and Tim Peters' Stupid Python Trick is still the > undisputed champion! It may be platform depended, but on my computer the obvious way is 10% faster the Stupid Python Trick.