Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.016 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.01; 'amounts': 0.07; 'discard': 0.07; 'memory.': 0.07; 'subject:file': 0.07; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'okay': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; '2.7': 0.14; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'to:addr:web.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'memory': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'task': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'quickly': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'follows': 0.31; 'running': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'depends': 0.38; 'massive': 0.38; 'how': 0.40; 'introduced': 0.61; 'believe': 0.68; '(according': 0.84; 'blow': 0.84; 'manager).': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'imagine': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gsqVJHZx2nx+OyF0SGRhgzDcW8bdvUK44Xbxnh3NfPo=; b=U8Og0ZHD33YE/QaV5rFv4LDVUwSI7e7oVgxrDmm3AOq4uUoun4vpSzQOd0Nedykle1 ckyHggw72L7B0fqOLG6kIFydHpYPEbkKj+/jfArdytMLNvx7xGDN8H5zu50IPlybV9eZ RkWWA1+krVO+PNUOUxNJHofjGx3+ylCrJKWiaYLPiic3uwNaz7YoeN8cnxGBKRrS6Di2 yv9xQG/nDy7LcmAqB5RBJjGvYcsjVlJbr8mv2KgFA6MT6Jya80WMZtRHZZ80gyfjIp+Y 9xhv/E3oVwLj9dXfglIpDZBLbrY+RgVbtJtKrSLkHOFaXYEoc7un1eLEfcX8elsH/taa V0Jg== X-Received: by 10.52.24.4 with SMTP id q4mr444753vdf.34.1379602153810; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:49:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <3018b3d4-f914-4c89-9f26-cd4b2af32e73@googlegroups.com> <52B7F7EA-C7C4-4DB6-A93C-25F4C058EB58@panix.com> From: Oscar Benjamin Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:48:53 +0100 Subject: Re: iterating over a file with two pointers To: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Python List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1379602164 news.xs4all.nl 15875 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32865 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:54426 On 19 September 2013 15:38, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: >> While running the above python.exe was using 6MB of memory (according >> to Task Manager). I believe this is because tee() works as follows >> (which I made up but it's how I imagine it). > > [...] > >> However, when I ran the above script on Python 2.7 it did consume >> massive amounts of memory (1.6GB) and ran slower so maybe this depends >> on optimisations that were introduced in 3.x. > > Did you use xrange()? No I didn't. :) Okay so it only uses 4.6MB of memory and it runs at the same speed: there's no problem with chaining tee objects as long as you discard them. If you don't discard them then a script like the one I wrote would quickly blow all the system memory. Oscar