Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.018 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'chunk': 0.07; 'agrees': 0.09; 'chunks': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; 'illustrates': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'scientist': 0.16; 'sign,': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'why.': 0.17; 'earlier': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'post': 0.28; 'thinks': 0.29; 'knows': 0.30; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'wrong': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'created': 0.36; 'characters': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'whom': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'stand': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'voice': 0.62; 'provide': 0.62; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'french': 0.64; 'euro': 0.69; 'everybody': 0.69; 'gain': 0.79; 'divide': 0.84; 'claim.': 0.91; 'received:2': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:16:14 +0100 References: <5062ad83$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <693ac61b-b1d3-4192-9e50-5166fd119278@googlegroups.com> <447851a9-bc63-4711-a4e6-bff565e28f1f@googlegroups.com> <2b2d20f5-2807-4a61-b284-8075e900db22@googlegroups.com> <50641d6d$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <50642DE0.8030102@mweb.co.za> <051dde5c-5293-4a9a-85c8-aa6714db4f69@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-97-73-49.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: <051dde5c-5293-4a9a-85c8-aa6714db4f69@googlegroups.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120927-0, 27/09/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348776909 news.xs4all.nl 6863 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47652 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30325 On 27/09/2012 20:09, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote: > This flexible string representation is wrong by design. Please state who agrees with this and why. > Expecting to divide "Unicode" in chunks and to gain something > is an illusion. Please provide the benchmarks to support your claim. > It has been created by a computer scientist who thinks "bytes" > when on that field one has to think "bytes" and usage of the > characters at the same time. Please name this computer scientist so everybody knows to whom you are referring. > The latin-1 chunk illustrates this wonderfully. I understand from an earlier post that latin-9 meets your needs completely for all French language characters plus the Euro sign, why don't you simply use that and stop rabitting on about latin-1. > > jmf > Would you please be so kind as to stand up as your voice is rather muffled. -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.