Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'chunk': 0.07; 'chunks': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'illustrates': 0.16; 'scientist': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'thinks': 0.29; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'wrong': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'created': 0.36; 'characters': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.40; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'gain': 0.79; 'divide': 0.84 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:09:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.203.64.55; posting-account=ung4FAoAAAC46zhHJ0Nsnuox7M5gDvs_ References: <5062ad83$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <693ac61b-b1d3-4192-9e50-5166fd119278@googlegroups.com> <447851a9-bc63-4711-a4e6-bff565e28f1f@googlegroups.com> <2b2d20f5-2807-4a61-b284-8075e900db22@googlegroups.com> <50641d6d$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <50642DE0.8030102@mweb.co.za> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 62.203.64.55 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python From: wxjmfauth@gmail.com To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348772985 news.xs4all.nl 6847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55483 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30323 This flexible string representation is wrong by design. Expecting to divide "Unicode" in chunks and to gain something is an illusion. It has been created by a computer scientist who thinks "bytes" when on that field one has to think "bytes" and usage of the characters at the same time. The latin-1 chunk illustrates this wonderfully. jmf