Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Python variable assigning problems... Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:20:07 -0700 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <4b28ee3d-47b3-40ef-b48e-abff720635ed@googlegroups.com> <0098ce4a-966b-41df-bf06-352ad451134f@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 716k91mJzJqUTTsewbRJsQ7zu8sBL1eeGR9WF2eVzOXA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.060 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.01; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'correct.': 0.07; 'here?': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 're-read': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:variable': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'agree': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'thank': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; "you'll": 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'differences': 0.66; 'answer,': 0.84; 'ian,': 0.84; 'ict': 0.84; 'different.': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:100283 On 12/11/2015 11:05 AM, ICT Ezy wrote: > Deat Ian, Thank you very much your answer, but above answer from > Robin Koch and your answer is different. What's the actually process > here? I agree with Robin Koch, but your answer is correct. Pl explain > differences ? If you go re-read the answers, you'll find Ian has explained why Robin was incorrect, and Robin acknowledged he got it wrong.