Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.066 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.87; '*S*': 0.00; 'logic': 0.09; 'enough.': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:need': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; '(not': 0.20; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'michael': 0.33; 'form.': 0.34; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'really': 0.35; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'yes': 0.60; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'edwards': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:52:22 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. References: <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl> <67de616e-5af7-417d-88a9-db1c665df473@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1432860747 news.xs4all.nl 2901 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49405 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:91414 On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2015-05-28, Michael Torrie wrote: >>> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahtoa82@gmail.com wrote: >>>> I think the logic you're really looking for is: >>>> >>>> return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected)) >>> >>> Yes this is the simplest form. >> >> Not really. True enough. My skills from EE are pretty rusty.