Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'pypy': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '"but': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'mess': 0.09; 'oh,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'runtime': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'simples': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'all,': 0.21; '(on': 0.22; 'machine': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'compiled': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'environment': 0.29; '+0100,': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'link,': 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'url:software': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'quickly': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'operations': 0.33; 'exist': 0.35; 'involving': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'more': 0.63; 'interest.': 0.78; 'received:2': 0.91; 'url:nz': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:47:08 +0100 References: <5063ee76$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-97-73-49.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: <5063ee76$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120927-0, 27/09/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348764434 news.xs4all.nl 6844 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49848 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30304 On 27/09/2012 07:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I though this might be of interest. >> >> http://www.ironfroggy.com/software/i-am-worried-about-the-future-of- > python > > > And a response: > > http://data.geek.nz/python-is-doing-just-fine > > > Well there's definite proof that the PyPy people are all completely incompetent in a response on the above link, this is how easy it is "But ... why does the runtime environment have to be so limiting? Operations involving primitives could be easily compiled (on the fly - JIT) to machine code and more advanced objects exist as plug-ins. Oh, and it would be nice to be able to write such objects quickly and easily - not the convoluted mess that it is currently." Simples :) -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.