Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'missed': 0.09; 'python': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; '"well,': 0.16; 'agree.': 0.16; 'article:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'succeeded.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'written': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; '+0100,': 0.29; '>>>>': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'summary': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'so,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'gives': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'easy': 0.60; 'referred': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'to,': 0.65; 'concerns': 0.65; 'direct': 0.69; 'article': 0.78; 'haha!': 0.84; 'maybe,': 0.84; 'why?': 0.84; 'dozen': 0.91; 'mistake': 0.91; 'received:2': 0.91; 'url:nz': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:45:03 +0100 References: <5063ee76$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <506461bc$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-97-73-49.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120927-0, 27/09/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 43 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348764115 news.xs4all.nl 6861 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46674 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30303 On 27/09/2012 17:16, Devin Jeanpierre wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano > wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:11:13 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: And a >>>> response: >>>> >>>> http://data.geek.nz/python-is-doing-just-fine >>> >>> Summary of that article: >>> >>> "Sure, you have all these legitimate concerns, but look, cake!" >> >> Did you read the article or just make up a witty response? If so, you >> half succeeded. >> >> It's more like, "Well, maybe, your concerns *might* be legitimate, but I >> don't think so because..." and then he gives half a dozen or more reasons >> why Python is in no danger. None of which involve cake, although one of >> them did involve Raspberry Pi. An easy mistake to make. > > Haha! :) > > Well, I don't agree. But let me explain. > [snipped] > -- Devin > The article Steven D'Aprano referred to is not a direct response to the article I referred to, yet your words are written as if it were. May I ask why? Or have I missed something? -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.