Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.albasani.net!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.nosignal.org!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'default.': 0.07; 'interpreted': 0.07; 'subject:test': 0.07; 'compute': 0.09; 'subtract': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'will,': 0.09; 'suggest': 0.11; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'trying': 0.21; 'thanks.': 0.21; 'sets': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'supported': 0.26; 'comparison': 0.29; 'loop,': 0.29; 'sense': 0.31; 'lists': 0.31; 'point': 0.31; 'ordered': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'false': 0.35; 'faster': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; "wasn't": 0.36; 'turn': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'item': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'perfect': 0.63; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'soon': 0.70; 'received:74.208': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'sets,': 0.84; 'angel': 0.93 Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:05:20 -0500 From: Dave Angel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: reduce expression to test sublist References: <76cd3945-392e-40d4-9f87-d3956b9521d2@googlegroups.com> <50E877C2.8090208@davea.name> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:IPMqOJTcYFSGnEjspR0gpk3rh7CrpSniUKDTyIoGdvt JzlOPk7Jou+GnjeyYHhYl1MucB1QiJeYSi5dD5nUucWi0Ua4u9 FcTf5sX9arHbwNx03No+j9lCJRBWkr7sUWbltDTHOn4xSuiTEM RL61k7c+tqeoONuoIsr4iKIh12aGGrSIiwpICUZktgagRsrlW0 ywew0bLJiK7AhOjCsP4C8+25QiKm5jgZW59KcC3QGWBxiq5ESA dUvj3MLwwLHxl6EFjnjitOcZSLJcIao04lbghCp4mVrwCTLypX 9QLyQ2ekDyxL5dF2dccKz2Yp3mRUcwGUX5/Uf8BAsD/cEbLdg= = X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@davea.name List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357423542 news.xs4all.nl 6857 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56164 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36215 On 01/05/2013 04:55 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 1/5/2013 1:58 PM, Dave Angel wrote: > >> If you're trying to make a faster loop, then I suggest you look into set >> differences. Turn both lists into sets, and subtract them. Something >> like (untested): >> >> result = not bool( set(lst1) - set(lst2) ) > > This does not return False as soon as an item in set1 is found that is > not in set2. > > set(lst1) < set(lst2) > > will, and directly return False/True. The OP is trying to compute the > lst1 < lst2, where lst1 and lst2 are interpreted as sets, rather than > as sequences with the lexicographic ordering default. > Thanks. I wasn't aware that sets supported ordered comparison that way, though it makes perfect sense now that you point it out. -- DaveA