Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'differently.': 0.07; 'happen,': 0.07; 'tab': 0.07; "(i'm": 0.09; 'attitude.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'configure': 0.10; 'broken': 0.12; 'devs': 0.16; 'fancy': 0.16; 'so"': 0.16; 'developers,': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'stick': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'indentation': 0.23; 'ones.': 0.23; 'pep': 0.23; 'personally,': 0.23; 'says': 0.27; 'work,': 0.28; 'mainly': 0.28; "i'm": 0.28; '24,': 0.29; 'fine.': 0.29; 'theoretical': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'fairly': 0.30; "ain't": 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'people,': 0.31; "can't": 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.34; 'file': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'core': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'reasons': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'mass': 0.38; 'allows': 0.38; 'couple': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'characters': 0.39; 'possible,': 0.39; 'received:78': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'subject:Please': 0.40; 'your': 0.61; 'world': 0.61; 'life': 0.63; 'our': 0.63; 'stand': 0.72; 'favour': 0.73; 'spaces': 0.73; 'sum': 0.74; 'received:as13285.net': 0.84; 'spaces.': 0.84; 'standardized': 0.84; 'violating': 0.84; 'subject:!!': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Please verify!! Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:49:50 +0000 References: <724ccbd6-30d1-41bd-bf38-2a5ce82953a1@x19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4F46C124.2070102@davea.name> <87mx88tyvc.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4f47808b$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-146-4-197.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120224-2, 24/02/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 35 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1330131002 news.xs4all.nl 6979 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59725 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20845 On 24/02/2012 20:41, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano > wrote: >> Personally, I prefer tabs for theoretical reasons and spaces for >> practical ones. I think that the world would be better off if we all >> standardised on tabs instead of spaces, but since that's not going to >> happen, I can interoperate better with the mass of broken tools out >> there, and with other people, by using spaces. >> > > At work, since we have a fairly small core of developers, we > standardized on tabs - mainly because of a couple of devs who > disagreed on how much indentation looked right (I'm of the opinion > that 1 space is insufficient), and having tab characters in the file > allows us to configure our editors differently. I'm definitely in > favour of using tabs where possible, but if you can't close your > environment, spaces are far safer. > > ChrisA Oo, thou sinner, fancy violating PEP 8 and standardising on tabs. OTOH if that's your standard and you stick to it fine. What I can't stand is the "I've always done it this way an I ain't movin jus cos sum standard says so" attitude. Yes I have seen this in real life and the person responsible should be sacked. -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.