Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'unicode.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; "i've": 0.23; 'idea': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'label': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'usually': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'done': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'truly': 0.62; 'americans.': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Article on the future of Python Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:29:49 -0400 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348702219 news.xs4all.nl 6889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42349 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30248 On 9/26/2012 2:58 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > You know, usually when I see software decried as America-centric, it's > because it doesn't support Unicode. This must be the first time I've > seen that label applied to software that dares to *fully* support Unicode. What is truly bizarre is the idea came from and much or most of the implementation was done by Europeans, not Americans. -- Terry Jan Reedy