Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Tim Delaney Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [OT] Java generics (was: Guido sees the light: PEP 8 updated) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:33:30 +1000 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 7sObOgwAKVt8xo1MRe3augKWTgUEqZyP0muA1KyF6Yug== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'heavily': 0.04; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'reliably': 0.09; 'received:209.85.218': 0.10; 'python': 0.10; 'language,': 0.11; 'languages.': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'cc:name:python': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Java': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.16; '>': 0.18; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'changes': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'fairly': 0.22; 'java': 0.22; 'referring': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'originally': 0.23; '(this': 0.24; 'tim': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'chris': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'specifically': 0.28; 'idea': 0.28; 'closer': 0.29; 'contractor': 0.29; 'system,': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'especially': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'source': 0.33; 'running': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'happened': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'skip:& 10': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'subject:the': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'more': 0.63; 'developed': 0.66; 'delaney': 0.84; 'nice,': 0.84; 'improvement': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Ir4rMt2m343sgW0Wl+JAy7rygJ0H4Kpoo0Rhe49K+U8=; b=sJB8+kxxtakmKc2s6mL3HJKRbjrxgIk9kmRdf/JchYuru8DvzeKxchAoEhr0sZEkCV 2AV12dLyYWMoW+KJlOVXfIBBnyeVqbb6mad/+9R8Oot4+tNbQUhqdvajDVv1Y7I0v8bi GMYjFhxI7gDLh5duYFkcVN7VH76AdQgO6A4iBPCN/l4K3BvTOCBuLWUysZpzxwv/aYvr dS6tz4kN/BjY1c03oto5h6CTUwyktyRGQWCt2l4R7FcJZgs15SU9CtC37cEuLUjpgFfn LVqFBgpSXqFTsHb5h20AZhUQC9X2lWHE7CHffgk8a7h/qLJzIgiCg9SnQBmmfDeBIcWE bt4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Ir4rMt2m343sgW0Wl+JAy7rygJ0H4Kpoo0Rhe49K+U8=; b=f3t8hTb6vdMh9qbIlgvVxlHurKe2T+yQWJT6z2ars6ICs6zt7YNr6DrZSLIRI7EIhU He8BWRTuvdA45FlMgmFc2iAqdBk0gcbr0HTT+Ow9mQID0Yeea9fLPD0COCiJZ/gwCI+q RmDWscxrMkq0wyqIwslGbzLMj1MTRogyLh3tryUbswdkIJ3lDC9EX1V4GA+qTEC9AN3I gsqz0dpTGf/g+CvlbQA/axDQARABxWjUqZaKsvAMZIVtFm61lMLa8LtBTwZ8N7a27UaU CwiojdVbqw7xz72bMG99VqeUMZ5dN/cDqYZVa6WiaOdUNMSnHISQpizG2ebHQ9ykHwWH LWLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUhQDedwtNgoHwU9MNkd3V9/tvj/oH/JOa3A5sy3324Ta1xp3szK0HYkNwRxdhkkekNrwowGXNdjxysDQ== X-Received: by 10.202.85.142 with SMTP id j136mr15301804oib.71.1460979210353; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:107266 On 18 April 2016 at 09:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Tim Delaney > wrote: > > I also wouldn't describe Java as a > > "perfectly good language" - it is at best a compromise language that just > > happened to be heavily promoted and accepted at the right time. > > > > Python is *much* closer to my idea of a perfectly good language. > > "Java" was originally four related, but separate, concepts: a source > language, a bytecode, a sandboxing system, and one other that I can't > now remember. I was very specifically referring to Java the language. The JVM is fairly nice, especially with the recent changes specifically aimed at more easily supporting dynamic languages. Speaking of JVM changes - I had to take over support of a chat applet developed by a contractor built on Java 1.0. We just could not get it to work reliably (this was for the original Foxtel web site - I remember trying to keep it up and running while Richard Fidler was doing a promoted chat session ...). Then Java 1.1 was released and what a huge improvement that was. Tim Delaney