Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.028 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'elif': 0.05; 'function:': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'way:': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; '"current': 0.16; '(actually': 0.16; '......': 0.16; "function's": 0.16; 'skip:> 20': 0.16; 'subject:avoiding': 0.16; 'subject:combinations': 0.16; 'instance,': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'function': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'file:': 0.31; 'common': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'full': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; 'on...': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'condition.': 0.84; 'received:192.114': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=yWsblZCvemmADiN3B2vujGfvEZefjIhCKCbnGgJQrVo=; b=dpxGcpagUOWaaUxSrkbfEIXnqQXFGOyrXYDf9UxB6fEuvvc/mtZ6ICAaGrrr1v5lm2 MuWSdOLRVt2dl3Gqw8b1PAi//+uybGhi2P2lxOwPoRcaCQY2MwPIMEzjwH4icktIPF3d A9WbgBY68S8R0vkaCylk1LHf2I/D5VTy8VQYPpUIjAkCrh0U8ckdeN7WQAcsGZyyIuI3 5l6vlIaynSQmIczhebo35cIQ01PT/lomZsfY6i2lqjIVKPee7cNhO/MlEbHAaS5q+Pme 0REgIhk0fvrZBAeosdpON8NWNmCQtk9Fk4I42tIfan2k1XfVO3meO8VgxfA5b0jIRQ4f srWQ== X-Received: by 10.194.61.51 with SMTP id m19mr20348388wjr.39.1427305417723; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:43:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ivan Evstegneev" To: Subject: Function Defaults - avoiding unneccerary combinations of arguments at input Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:43:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdBnIseOUtS+o5hEQ+yLx91p6iKzvQ== Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.19 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 47 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1427305418 news.xs4all.nl 2837 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33098 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:87955 Hello all , Just a little question about function's default arguments. Let's say I have this function: def my_fun(history=False, built=False, current=False, topo=None, full=False, file=None): if currnet and full: do something_1 elif current and file: do something_2 elif history and full and file: do something_3 ...... some code here.............. and so on... I won't cover all the possibilities here (actually I don't use all of them ^_^). The question is about avoiding the response for unnecessary combinations? For instance, if user will call function this way: >>>my_fun(current=True, full=True, topo='some str', file="some_file") That will lead to function's misbehavior. As a particular case it will choose "current and full" condition. What is the common accepted way to deal with such unwanted situations? Thanks a lot in advance, Ivan.