Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'skip:[ 20': 0.03; 'messages.': 0.04; 'newbie': 0.05; 'result,': 0.05; 'item.': 0.07; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; '[1,': 0.09; 'compact': 0.09; 'dict': 0.09; 'indeed,': 0.09; 'python:': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'dec': 0.15; 'sat,': 0.15; 'bind': 0.16; 'googled': 0.16; 'it..': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'subject:question.': 0.16; 'value:': 0.16; 'wanted.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'instance': 0.17; 'solution.': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'variable': 0.20; 'question.': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'not,': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; "haven't": 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'tried': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'to?': 0.27; 'decide': 0.28; 'case,': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'error': 0.30; 'lists': 0.31; 'gets': 0.32; 'like:': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; "can't": 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'profile': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'results': 0.65; 'answer.': 0.71; 'obvious': 0.71; 'goal': 0.74; 'inefficient': 0.91; 'joel': 0.91 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:40:04 -0500 From: Mitya Sirenef User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Goldstick Subject: Re: dict comprehension question. References: <724d4fea-606a-4503-b538-87442f6bcebc@ci3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <50DF4C00.2020505@lightbird.net> <50DF4E15.1030700@lightbird.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 84 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1356817208 news.xs4all.nl 6869 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47403 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35783 On 12/29/2012 03:15 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mitya Sirenef > wrote: > > On 12/29/2012 03:01 PM, Mitya Sirenef wrote: > > On 12/29/2012 02:48 PM, Quint Rankid wrote: > > >> Newbie question. I've googled a little and haven't found the > answer. > >> > >> Given a list like: > >> w = [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 1] > >> I would like to be able to do the following as a dict > comprehension. > >> a = {} > >> for x in w: > >> a[x] = a.get(x,0) + 1 > >> results in a having the value: > >> {1: 3, 2: 2, 3: 1, 4: 2, 5: 1, 6: 1} > >> > >> I've tried a few things > >> eg > >> a1 = {x:self.get(x,0)+1 for x in w} > >> results in error messages. > >> > >> And > >> a2 = {x:a2.get(x,0)+1 for x in w} > >> also results in error messages. > >> > >> Trying to set a variable to a dict before doing the comprehension > >> a3 = {} > >> a3 = {x:a3.get(x,0)+1 for x in w} > >> gets this result, which isn't what I wanted. > >> {1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1, 5: 1, 6: 1} > >> > >> I'm not sure that it's possible to do this, and if not, perhaps the > >> most obvious question is what instance does the get method bind to? > >> > >> TIA > > > > Will this do?: > > > > >>> w = [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 1] > > >>> {x: w.count(x) for x in w} > > {1: 3, 2: 2, 3: 1, 4: 2, 5: 1, 6: 1} > > > > > > - mitya > > > > I should probably add that this might be inefficient for large > lists as > it repeats count for each item. If you need it for large lists, > profile > against the 'for loop' version and decide if performance is good > enough > for you, for small lists it's a nice and compact solution. > > In a more general case, you can't refer to the list/dict/etc > comprehension as it's being constructed, that's just not a design goal > of comprehensions. > > > Would this help: > > >>> w = [1,2,3,1,2,4,4,5,6,1] > >>> s = set(w) > >>> s > set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]) > >>> {x:w.count(x) for x in s} > {1: 3, 2: 2, 3: 1, 4: 2, 5: 1, 6: 1} > >>> Indeed, this is much better -- I didn't think of it.. -- Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/