Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'performs': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'incorrect': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; "wouldn't": 0.11; '(like': 0.15; 'applies': 0.15; '12:50': 0.16; 'behaviour.': 0.16; 'gained': 0.16; 'javascript)': 0.16; 'luckily': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'unicode': 0.17; '3.2': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'points': 0.29; 'this.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'asking': 0.32; 'correctly.': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'except': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'end': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'range': 0.60; 'link': 0.60; 'you.': 0.61; 'solve': 0.62; 'results': 0.65; 'bothered': 0.65; 'user,': 0.69; 'wish': 0.70; 'counts': 0.81; 'received:209.85.220.184': 0.91 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.62.66.29; posting-account=ung4FAoAAAC46zhHJ0Nsnuox7M5gDvs_ References: <5062ad83$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <693ac61b-b1d3-4192-9e50-5166fd119278@googlegroups.com> <447851a9-bc63-4711-a4e6-bff565e28f1f@googlegroups.com> <2b2d20f5-2807-4a61-b284-8075e900db22@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 81.62.66.29 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python From: wxjmfauth@gmail.com To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348672685 news.xs4all.nl 6957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45442 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30213 Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 16:56:55 UTC+2, Chris Angelico a =E9crit=A0: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:50 AM, wrote: >=20 > > I just see the results and the facts. For an end >=20 > > user, this is the only thing that counts. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then what counts is that Python 3.2 (like Javascript) exhibits >=20 > incorrect behaviour, and Python (like Pike) performs correctly. >=20 >=20 >=20 > I think this tee applies to you. http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/f147/ >=20 >=20 >=20 > ChrisA >=20 > wouldn't have bothered to respond except that that link was asking to be = shared "You" have gained a broader range of unicode code points and the same time you "broke" a correct BMP behaviour. There is a simple solution to solve this. "You" do not wish to use it. Luckily for me, the tools I'm using use that one. jmf