Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.157 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.71; '*S*': 0.02; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'function,': 0.09; 'true)': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'arg):': 0.16; 'arg,': 0.16; 'time.time()': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'passing': 0.19; 'skip:{ 20': 0.24; 'regardless': 0.24; 'first,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'run': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'responsible': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'dave': 0.60; 'ian': 0.60; 'is.': 0.60; 'took': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'reverse': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'other.': 0.75; '2015': 0.84; '3:00': 0.84; 'difference.': 0.84; 'angel': 0.91; 'cause,': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=/tbsfOmNCFHNrqzAaAVlNfhoK1yQYY2ccsGv1ItHCQc=; b=Q0Rb6sH9q7QtrMI/GvjIeeneTh1MC0b/gVRf4PBb5YHlnxtKE2P0UA43VY9t0z7yki xuNvuohc3cVFTDPrxkMP+R7Zw9f6f+4sGSwRMJXNHgkB7/kemkfI3qSVqXp/34sTtHZV SCtz9IlRZv1lnYLnDry/5Fu9e9T9epb0Whdgc3RuVHbj0BMHr4PFiK6j8m5fmsDDXglZ x4OrTzMaF30p3lGHyymu7ZZbnUe/dZKtnG4NJGZRwXr7s9fpHR1ISl7WXrQHwc2knvw0 2wP3zCmfFus1fPR1KusPx7iY9p1V1LbwurBH9MEeErj/G+jjeIzIHFANOjNVuMxCtHGD pYKg== X-Received: by 10.107.12.158 with SMTP id 30mr21868458iom.61.1430862016817; Tue, 05 May 2015 14:40:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <87h9rvm576.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <871tixlmp6.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <750db03b-e393-43ff-9ccf-5cc050af7324@googlegroups.com> <87zj5jf15q.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <55490FAE.8070501@davea.name> <55492F55.1020105@davea.name> From: Ian Kelly Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 15:39:36 -0600 Subject: Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1430862019 news.xs4all.nl 2870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36970 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:90004 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dave Angel wrote: >> def loop(func, funcname, arg): >> start = time.time() >> for i in range(repeats): >> func(arg, True) >> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start)) >> >> start = time.time() >> for i in range(repeats): >> func(arg) >> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start)) > > Note that you're explicitly passing True in one case but leaving the > default in the other. I don't know whether that might be responsible > for the difference you're seeing. I don't think that's the cause, but I do think that it has something to do with the way the timing is being run. When I run your loop function, I do observe the difference. If I reverse the order so that the False case is tested first, I observe the opposite. That is, the slower case is consistently the one that is timed *first* in the loop function, regardless of which case that is.