Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'correct.': 0.07; 'performs': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'counting': 0.09; 'semantics': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'worse': 0.09; '3.2.': 0.16; 'badly.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'thread.': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'comparing': 0.17; '3.2': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'non': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'build,': 0.29; 'high.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'basic': 0.30; 'builds': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'needed': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'characters': 0.36; 'compare': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'wide': 0.62; '26,': 0.65; 'price': 0.66; 'soon': 0.70; 'idiot,': 0.84; 'resolved.': 0.91; '***': 0.93; 'serious': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zzLkO2IqC7KIk0/MepUDbW9Mx/3SFDlQJ1x0cqbizxU=; b=jOJ0X76Lavj/VxMW/Lj4yPb4a/otkAitiBiK0vrzEyZasdcrNX/Wn4j5+AjP2JWFfp HVFKOEVMxKlWa4c0/T+ztXblKWwSMOFEBuEovAWZCE++nqqJlMw1OHF4oZZrE778/i7+ T/lr3509uHFEBWz9IueVjb5vGMALvigKFaqI3LWW0I8DIFdVTM4iOwu1q0wT/zSGoOn/ TN0ZbeXYFlx0fUNpCXo+/kg4JrTvzaYTe9PyybgMoIDw7JiQ33cmWRX7L+84CiOgbfGu SobkWYYkSsEHu/u2D6OXt+ETmj0+8tM4GjrwFvJD3t7nKHVHDjUXTzCZW2j7PCUngroT LoGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <693ac61b-b1d3-4192-9e50-5166fd119278@googlegroups.com> References: <5062ad83$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <693ac61b-b1d3-4192-9e50-5166fd119278@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:55:12 +1000 Subject: Re: Article on the future of Python From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1348653316 news.xs4all.nl 6917 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40386 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30179 On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, wrote: > you are correct. But the price you pay for this is extremely > high. Now, practically all characters are affected, espacially > those *in* the Basic *** Multilingual*** Plane, these characters > used by non "American" user (No offense here, I just use this > word for ascii/latin-1). > > I'm ready to be considered as an idiot, but I'm not blind. > As soon as I tested these characters, Py3.3 performs really > badly. It seems to me it is legitimate to consider, there > is a serious problem here. We've been over this thread. The only reason you're counting 3.3 as worse is because you're comparing against a narrow build of Python 3.2. Narrow builds are **BUGGY** and this needed to be resolved. When you compare against a wide build, semantics of 3.2 and 3.3 are identical, and then - and ONLY then - can you sanely compare performance. And 3.3 stacks up much better. ChrisA