Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Emile van Sebille Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: There has to be a better way to split this string! Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:22:56 -0800 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <20160210065002.GA86307@cskk.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de d9/u/djYzqF8aVIhP79xLwDyxzoXQzhEbSPJTFlrV7zg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'enough.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'subject:There': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'trying': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'idea': 0.28; 'awake': 0.29; 'list': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'mailing': 0.38; 'unable': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'cameron': 0.66; 'realise': 0.66; 'reply': 0.68; 'received:12': 0.81; 'subject:this': 0.85 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.westernstatesglass.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: <20160210065002.GA86307@cskk.homeip.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21rc2 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:102962 On 2/9/2016 10:50 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 10Feb2016 07:34, srinivas devaki wrote: >> PS: trying to read mailing list when you are half woke, is a bad idea and >> trying reply to it is even bad idea. > > Regrettably, when one is half awake one is unable to realise what a bad > idea it may be:-) Not to worry -- you find out quick enough. :) Emile