Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '(python': 0.05; 'args': 0.07; 'method,': 0.07; 'subject:based': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'argument,': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'arguments.': 0.09; 'counting': 0.09; 'positional': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'def': 0.14; 'argument': 0.15; 'docstring': 0.16; 'furman': 0.16; 'only,': 0.16; 'subject:interface': 0.16; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.16; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'assume': 0.22; 'jan': 0.22; '27,': 0.23; 'alan': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; '...': 0.31; 'actually': 0.31; 'thu,': 0.31; 'parse': 0.34; 'whether': 0.34; 'checking': 0.35; 'subject:/': 0.37; 'names': 0.38; 'either': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'might': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'could': 0.40; 'contact': 0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D41CE70.1090900@stoneleaf.us> References: <4D41CE70.1090900@stoneleaf.us> From: Alan Franzoni Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:12:45 +0100 Subject: Re: Behaviour-based interface/protocol implementation? To: Ethan Furman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1296162794 news.xs4all.nl 65870 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:36699 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:55932 On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > When you signature check, do you mean counting the number of arguments, or > actually checking argument types? In order to check for argument types I should either assume type annotation (python 3 only, optional) or parse the docstring for the method, which might not be available or be out of sync. I just want to check for method name, number and/or names of the arguments. It might not be trivial in python because the very same argument can be passed either as a positional or a kw argument, so def method1(self, a, b): ... def method1(self, c, d): ... could satisfy or not the very same interface, depending whether the args are passed as postional or kw. -- Alan Franzoni -- contact me at public@[mysurname].eu