Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feed.xsnews.nl!fbe002.ams.xsnews.nl!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.076 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.85; '*S*': 0.00; 'true,': 0.05; 'explicit': 0.07; 'python': 0.11; 'seconds.': 0.16; 'with?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; 'separate': 0.22; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'testing': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'this.': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.34; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'dave': 0.60; 'took': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; '2015': 0.84; 'difference.': 0.84; 'replicate': 0.84; 'angel': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pv+CzBhVtKLI/pF5uL//koREGf67vXlpUyEo6Kn8oXU=; b=g6XWmqDDnAljLY9N+1/kfYFMoMa/yhByAEXIgucLSi+ieojiJZ0eQpYmJqwWQuN3ng uJKo8BQ47S+0laV1NGsen+9c1VQ5FJ5JwvxU7RKv/IjPspgQWV9e96YR3S3AFX+c3stM 3RcqwybSdFgPF2HM9YUUvcDiuEBApK9viLmOeSDrFBhcJbSpVfl2mVu65c6Z0MGGtqSk k1ulQ4Sd9JChkfQdIPR9CvBHzh7wZcfNlpgQfPIYyBW0IWVjlUSwKRDvWJzr3L9tSOX4 aHyUsO1T2yezub5bC1znQSWK+jA3x4Dm48cuzrjEbi3JAwfvJhsL2YNFix1nCSpOUdnF rfzQ== X-Received: by 10.43.65.19 with SMTP id xk19mr8997642icb.20.1430857890361; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:31:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55490FAE.8070501@davea.name> References: <87h9rvm576.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <871tixlmp6.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <750db03b-e393-43ff-9ccf-5cc050af7324@googlegroups.com> <87zj5jf15q.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <55490FAE.8070501@davea.name> From: Ian Kelly Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:30:50 -0600 Subject: Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1430857893 news.xs4all.nl 2924 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39051 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:89999 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Dave Angel wrote: > When the "simple" is True, the function takes noticeably and consistently > longer. For example, it might take 116 instead of 109 seconds. For the > same counts, your code took 111. I can't replicate this. What version of Python is it, and what value of x are you testing with? > I've looked at dis.dis(factorial_iterative), and can see no explicit reason > for the difference. My first thought is that maybe it's a result of the branch. Have you tried swapping the branches, or reimplementing as separate functions and comparing?