Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Antoon Pardon Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: the global keyword: Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:35:29 +0200 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <5766ADB1.6070907@rece.vub.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de +p/+yyG6c+xxeyrKXBlACAANmAm771NjgVXl9GasoSsA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.287 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.48; '*S*': 0.05; 'inaccurate': 0.16; 'received:adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'thread.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'referring': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'received:be': 0.30; 'supposed': 0.31; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:the': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'between': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'received:195.238': 0.84; 'remark': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84; 'subject::': 0.85; 'received:192.168.1.7': 0.91 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CWAQDurGZX/yqRhG0NT8FvhhcCgVkQAQEBAQEBAYVYAQEEeBELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAK2f41RgxoBAQgnhieETYUMhQ8BBI11iwGBWIxSgVONT493NYQRizQBAQE User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:45:48 -0400 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <5766ADB1.6070907@rece.vub.ac.be> X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:110144 Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC: > On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote: >> Just as here there is no link between x >> and y: >> >> x = 12 >> y = x > > (And that's a good illustration of why 'y' isn't a name reference to 'x', referring to the "...ducks limp" thread. But best not to rake it up again...) > I find this rather inaccurate reference to what your opposition is supposed to have states together with the remark best not to rake this up again, rather disingenuous