Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'encoding': 0.05; 'mrab': 0.05; 'great.': 0.07; 'json': 0.07; 'parser': 0.07; 'parsers': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'thus,': 0.09; 'systems.': 0.12; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; '(but': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; 'this?': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'define': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'compatible': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'requiring': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'therefore,': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'superior': 0.69; 'offer.': 0.74; "'true'": 0.84; 'much,': 0.84; 'examine': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Ned Batchelder Subject: Re: Storing instances using jsonpickle Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:30:14 -0400 References: <46e782a5-b087-4f95-aadb-26e233bf5419@googlegroups.com> <5407A69B.3030707@mrabarnett.plus.com> <87fvg6j8dq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 18.189.8.234 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <87fvg6j8dq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1409938229 news.xs4all.nl 2958 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54873 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:77600 On 9/5/14 1:16 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > MRAB : > >> Therefore, if you want it to be able to drop it into Python's REPL, it >> won't be compatible with JSON anyway! (Well, not unless you define >> 'true' and 'false' first.) > > Sigh. I was so hopeful JSON would be great. Unfortunately, it flopped by > requiring the parser to heuristically support 5 encoding systems. I don't understand how JSON has flopped? The parser may be a bit more complex (but not much, it isn't hard to examine the first few bytes), but you're using off-the-shelf parsers anyway, so why are you concerned by this? > > Thus, ast.literal_eval() is superior to anything JSON has to offer. > > > Marko > -- Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com