Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'parameters': 0.04; 'mrab': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; "%s'": 0.16; '%s,': 0.16; 'commas:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'there?': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'putting': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'chase': 0.31; 'list': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'transfer': 0.82 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: python string, best way to concat Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:59:30 +0200 Organization: None References: <55bab2a0-e0bc-4398-90b4-c9937498f5d8@googlegroups.com> <53FE5EDD.9020502@mrabarnett.plus.com> <20140827174446.11a1cd01@bigbox.christie.dr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd9c3c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1409180390 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53604 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:77174 Tim Chase wrote: > On 2014-08-27 23:42, MRAB wrote: >> How many parameters are there? len(self.param) >> >> Make that many placeholders and then join them together with commas: >> >> ', '.join(['?'] * len(self.param)) > > I prefer the clarity of Peter Otten's suggestion of > > ', '.join('?' * len(self.param)) > > over the mild obscurity of putting it in a list before multiplying. As long as the OP doesn't try to transfer this to other paramstyles: >>> ", ".join(["%s"]*3) '%s, %s, %s' >>> ", ".join("%s"*3) # OOPS '%, s, %, s, %, s'