Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.usenet.farm!feeder1.xsusenet.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: best text editor for programming Python on a Mac Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:19:36 -0600 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de KZJOtvmb8gLCHIfwfge8SgMeDfHd5KgCz0pSC1AQ6MNQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:text': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'subject:editor': 0.07; 'editor.': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Mac': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'fine': 0.28; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'someone': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'matter': 0.63; 'here': 0.66; 'choice.': 0.93; 'hands': 0.96 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:110140 On 06/19/2016 04:41 AM, Pete Forman wrote: > Both emacs and vim are powerful tools in the hands of experienced users > but I would recommend neither to someone starting out who is just > looking for a code-aware editor. In any case this doesn't matter here because the original poster already said he was using vim. Sticking with vim is a fine choice.