Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.034 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'thats': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; '24,': 0.16; 'ball.': 0.16; 'both,': 0.16; 'jr.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'app': 0.19; 'community,': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; 'aug': 0.22; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; '2.x': 0.24; 'comparing': 0.24; 'plus.': 0.24; 'initial': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'compiled': 0.26; 'nearly': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'largest': 0.30; '3.x': 0.31; 'dropped': 0.31; 'faster,': 0.31; 'libraries': 0.31; 'loads': 0.31; 'weeks': 0.32; 'community': 0.33; 'noticed': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'limited,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'entire': 0.61; 'making': 0.63; 'real': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'pays': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'sam': 0.68; 'influence': 0.74; 'bills,': 0.84; 'hate': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9rhD4Fx7BP5uUzf3z+OBtyhDtEV++clRt+ExT7fZ35Y=; b=fuGEojbH4am3thxLWun22/TU5269JAQKdhL9oC5mGq7t0m6DfUDFrJB2bxzegPpT9x jdUFSvYkKruNMoZNUmqxNcMCw11e8EoVSVg3xxNc8/I4Xp/iwnBHknkBa/Um0f/QBmX0 tdqI55ViACo+ogM4+y5UCFPnHkjA529fWAbtjqU1RWhZRfzPR43lxhe1TGNqMaK1lrjL aQgdBTIaADSpjob/enXEDVh9ZD1Eo9WJEBMMznAFe0B3u+2TGY0eBKoaqIWacGVs/RUe 7QyfFa5Be5kW1b697Jq4okzcNiaUFC1eJF1t3hW7zhHij4/U4ZePDaeFXKmn58XReZq0 iDMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.62.7 with SMTP id wy7mr3068054vcb.66.1408935437783; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:57:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:57:17 -0500 Subject: Re: GO vs Python From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Rodrick Brown Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11347dc647db6305016b5862 Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 74 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1408935439 news.xs4all.nl 2844 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44242 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76957 --001a11347dc647db6305016b5862 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote: > I spent a few weeks looking at Go and have to say you can see a lot of > Python's influence in Go, however my question to this list for others who > are doing real work with Go and Python have you encountered any scenarios > in which Go outmatched Python in terms of elegance or performance? > > --RB > I use both, Python pays the bills, and I use it at work or on consulting gigs. for most things GO is faster, GO is compiled and that is a huge plus. the Go community is not nearly as large as pythons, there are loads more libraries and tools for python my initial reason for even looking at GO, was because, I noticed that if I wanted to move my largest clients app from Python 2.x to 3.x it was almost a rewrite..... and then when I noticed the libraries for python 3.x were limited, and some python 2.x libraries are not even making a 3.x version... Well I got scared, Go started to look attractive, because your no longer comparing GO to the entire python community, it is GO vs python 3... thats just my 2 cents, I like python and it pays my bills... but I hate the way python delt with the 2.x - 3.x, they dropped the ball. -- Sam Fourman Jr. --001a11347dc647db6305016b5862 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.= com> wrote:
I spent a few weeks lo= oking at Go and have to say you can see a lot of Python's influence in = Go, however my question to this list for others who are doing real work wit= h Go and Python have you encountered any scenarios in which Go outmatched P= ython in terms of elegance or performance?=C2=A0

--RB


I use both, Python pays the bills, and I use it at w= ork or on consulting gigs.
for most things GO is faster, GO is co= mpiled and that is a huge plus.
=C2=A0
the Go community is not nearly as large as python= s, there are loads more libraries and tools for python

=
my initial reason for even looking at GO, was because, I noticed that = if I wanted to move my largest clients app from Python 2.x to 3.x it was al= most a rewrite..... and then when I noticed the libraries for python 3.x we= re limited, and some python 2.x libraries are not even making a 3.x version= ...

Well I got scared, Go started to look attractive, becau= se your no longer comparing GO to the entire python community, it is GO vs = python 3...


thats just my 2 cents, = I like python and it pays my bills... but I hate the way python delt with t= he 2.x - 3.x, they dropped the ball.

--

Sam Fourman Jr.
--001a11347dc647db6305016b5862--