Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed1.swip.net!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.031 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'familiarity': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'mostly': 0.14; '23,': 0.16; 'expert.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'aug': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'paul': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'rest': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'program,': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'e.g.': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'easy': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'yourself': 0.78; '5:36': 0.84; "it'd": 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=HkoVMnpR0Bgi/wDhtZ5blBBXRreirqb+Jk+0VIDCr2g=; b=M6P6ykZ7GmkBKZAJczaYaQgyTJL7uj7KDc5NNRcLK88OKofCtB/QBnGcedz36urMwn rQc+tySlc6rd4Gv79t5u26dyC46607u+kOoLLBgA1g7rxsNeTEeTY8mqFzmUk9ZXajmF 8Eg/PYHMOgcTUEkeLbXLZh/700mnI+2TYjAMf+8YzeeJ1hgQtfAtaH5dHQH6ORbOphyO 1uvfucj8VgOKBY2rNG5nxQa/Flc1pBqcRs89tiK2+5HMjkO+yoBTB/eOdFrEoheiJLlJ WznBGaR6cpowvxv0H7btsUgPhjTsW4YUYdP0Q0AQAZ/T0Y47AH6XJBZtvmK0K5yAfwuT ft0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.176.202 with SMTP id ck10mr3506320igc.2.1408781059567; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 01:04:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87iolj64jq.fsf@rudin.co.uk> References: <87fvgoj2i8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87siko9tlq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <53F7B870.2010909@gmail.com> <87ioljpx4t.fsf@handshake.de> <87iolj64jq.fsf@rudin.co.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:04:19 +1000 Subject: Re: Python vs C++ From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1408781068 news.xs4all.nl 2896 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57354 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76849 On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Paul Rudin wrote: > I'm unconvinced is that e.g. LaTeX is inherently more "expert" that Word > for simple document preparation. It's mostly a question of familiarity. I think LaTeX probably is, in the same way that PhotoShop or Gimp is more expert than a simple paint program, but something like ReST should be easy for anyone to work with... and it'd require less familiarity than Word does before you get to call yourself an expert. ChrisA