Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder2.hal-mli.net!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'mentioned,': 0.07; 'function:': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; 'lambda:': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'cases': 0.15; 'dec': 0.15; 'lambda': 0.16; 'possible?': 0.16; 'world!")': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'import': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'idea': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.28; 'returned': 0.30; 'thursday,': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'up.': 0.31; 'december': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'anywhere': 0.33; 'goes': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'text': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'your': 0.60 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:55:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=117.194.200.146; posting-account=4mdDiQoAAAB1VBViHzAN7cTcuXiGgMWL References: <0kknd8tbg7knqa1ng6igbj8u82mqb720oi@4ax.com> <442ad592-1435-4be2-820d-970f7c8b86d0@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 117.194.200.146 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Finding the name of a function while defining it From: Abhas Bhattacharya To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1356594951 news.xs4all.nl 6893 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59145 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35597 On Thursday, 27 December 2012 13:22:45 UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Abhas Bhattacharya > > wrote: > > > [ a whole lot of double-spaced quoted text - please trim it ] > > > If i call one() and two() respectively, i would like to see "one" and "two". > > > > That completely goes against your idea of knowing at compile-time, > > because the name "two" isn't anywhere around at that time. > > > > There's no way to know what name was used to look something up. It > > might not even have a name - the called function could well have been > > returned from another function: > > > > # foo.py > > def indirection(): > > return lambda: print > > > > # bar.py > > import foo > > foo.indirection()()("Hello, world!") > > > > What are the names of all the functions called here? > > > > ChrisA Yes, I get it that it may not be possible in complex cases (mostly using lambda functions). But in the simple case I mentioned, is it possible?