Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; 'a():': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:?)': 0.16; 'threads.': 0.16; 'unnecessary.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'nearly': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'have,': 0.30; 'could': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'previous': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'received:71': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'matter': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'great': 0.65; 'opinions': 0.70; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: proposed syntax for multiline anony-functions (hopefully?) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:07:25 -0400 References: <1bd05b41-ad00-4ce8-8678-de51205ebc3b@googlegroups.com> <913e5a30-f89b-4e94-afb4-b3d302ed44ac@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-175-90-87.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <913e5a30-f89b-4e94-afb4-b3d302ed44ac@googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1408615695 news.xs4all.nl 2903 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44599 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76730 On 8/21/2014 5:14 AM, icefapper@gmail.com wrote: > it is simply a matter of convenience: > > > def a(): > print( "gvr" ) > func(a); > > or > > func( def(): > print("gvr") > ) > > it would be great if others could further share their opinions I have, multiple time in previous threads. A bad idea. Unnecessary. Nearly useless. -- Terry Jan Reedy