Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76622
| References | <51dfbe9b-f6e0-4532-bc2d-e7ce2fc282b5@googlegroups.com> <mailman.13116.1408398154.18130.python-list@python.org> <3fb3b4d1-a7e2-4912-a878-7d5e1798aee6@googlegroups.com> <CAGGBd_pkisTMGcJ0S7c+eD3JXdSv3rHCwKD_PWb9dx1YQagkfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGBd_rwWvt+kGas0svbuR0oxNFRFyZ7d-8RDSuO9dJSY3bLzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-19 16:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13179.1408490569.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote: >> When you use heapq, are you putting all the values in the heap, or >> just up to n at a time (evicting the worst value, one at a time as you >> go)? If you're doing the former, it's basically a heapsort which >> probably won't beat timsort. If you're doing the latter, that should >> be pretty good. > > It just occurred to me that evicting the highest value each step of > the way might be expensive with a traditional heap (since the value at > the largest array index isn't necessarily the largest). I've > experimented with doing this using a treap a bit: > http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/treap/ You might try that. Or more directly relevant: http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/highest/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
efficient partial sort in Python ? Chiu Hsiang Hsu <wdv4758h@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 10:18 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 12:48 -0600
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 14:42 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Chiu Hsiang Hsu <wdv4758h@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 12:37 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-19 18:11 -0400
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 16:05 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 16:22 -0700
Re: efficient partial sort in Python ? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 18:00 -0600
csiph-web