Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.053 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:help': 0.07; 'python:': 0.09; 'rfc': 0.09; 'dec': 0.15; 'fine.': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'insert': 0.23; 'least': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'lines': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'occurred': 0.29; 'worked': 0.30; 'problem.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'agree': 0.34; 'loss': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:Please': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'delete': 0.38; 'gives': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'postal': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'saw': 0.75; 'played': 0.84; 'viable': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.88 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:42:39 -0500 From: Mitya Sirenef User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Please help if you can! References: <7333128a-6866-4e3c-8436-d5b2397beadc@googlegroups.com> <50DBA1A5.1010003@lightbird.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1356572563 news.xs4all.nl 6848 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37780 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35566 On 12/26/2012 08:23 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mitya Sirenef wrote: >> I have to agree - I saw that howto as well and it occurred to me >> that if we have to delete blank lines manually we might >> as well use postal pigeons with tiny little papyrus scrolls - >> at least those don't insert blank lines automatically! > Yes, but they have poor latency, and packet loss due to hawks is a > major problem. But an RFC 1149 network is plausible, even if not > viable in most situations. > > ChrisA I don't know, I played starcraft II by pigeon-net and it worked just fine. Yes, latency is quite bad but it gives you more time to think about strategy... -m -- Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/