Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; '3.0.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '3.0': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'subject:like': 0.24; '2.0': 0.26; 'second': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'that.': 0.31; 'minor': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'bugs': 0.33; 'version': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; 'received:12': 0.81; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Emile van Sebille Subject: Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:45:11 -0700 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.westernstatesglass.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1408398332 news.xs4all.nl 2864 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60328 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76519 On 8/18/2014 2:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-08-18, Ethan Furman wrote: >> On 08/18/2014 07:51 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> >>> To all of us out here in user-land a change in the first value in the >>> version tuple means breakage and incompatibilities. And when the >>> second value is "0", you avoid it until some other sucker has found >>> the bugs and a few more minor releases have come out. >> >> Even our own 3.0 was like that. > > So was 2.0, only it wasn't quite as distruptive as 3.0. As I recall, 2.0 _was_ 1.6. Emile