Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.031 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'apis': 0.09; 'deprecated': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'backward': 0.16; 'considers': 0.16; 'effect,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'tuples,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'aug': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'subject:like': 0.24; 'versions': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'then.': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'comments': 0.31; '(since': 0.31; '4.0': 0.31; 'agreed.': 0.31; 'breaking': 0.31; 'minor': 0.31; 'stuff': 0.32; '"the': 0.34; 'agree': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'next': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'stopped': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'release': 0.40; 'remove': 0.60; 'everybody': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'happen': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; '"simply': 0.84; '3.10': 0.84; '3.6': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=en9kLrjq/dp/m9COABNit/ydDBrQJUnmfvPjreYaPS4=; b=gbUQgrxGOqsacR2CIpxgHTATIWoJDxp6KsTBVR+01AXZ4uCCyiVoE6MiBjmB0ZORDM qZ7SQTRPDcEYtSFEWOxtog49DY4JyXucTjpxAy9/mpAO6XqgQv3+3DxlKr80ymkvWxZF JCOBg0oEaOv0w1NyZPBFqJYp76IbtDA5c5MQIEycQ4PKhswHO8Mz6WMqOjfBCN7KRSIj hDKR04VXM9pT4UZN1Sr9bRRra39EBEA5J30vj1wCeNJUQd1P+m3rBhCw6p1lO6bkcrw8 u9flvBdqgUQe4jx2ZnYThBZuAp2O4S+5Wa7+upf4YLjxY0q225CN8Njn0hCY9M+si0Bz VaDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.94.34 with SMTP id cz2mr75096931wib.74.1408374193729; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 01:03:13 +1000 Subject: Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1408374195 news.xs4all.nl 2868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59869 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76481 On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > I agree with the comments that the appellation for "simply the next > version after 3.9" should be 3.10 and not 4.0. Everybody I know > considers SW versions numbers to be dot-separated tuples, not > floating point numbers. > Agreed. However, by the time 3.9 comes out, there'll have been all those years of changes. "The version after 3.9" would be a good time to remove stuff that's been deprecated since 3.3 or 3.6 or whatever; technically, that's breaking backward compat (hence 4.0 rather than 3.10), but in effect, it's no more breakage than a minor release would give you (since you should have stopped using deprecated APIs several versions ago). So there's still value in going to 4.0 around about ten versions after 3.0; but it doesn't necessarily have to happen exactly then. ChrisA