Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.019 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'url:bugs': 0.05; 'wed,': 0.12; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'subject:skip:t 10': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'seems': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'noticed': 0.26; 'all,': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'fixed': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'looks': 0.30; 'least': 0.31; "i've": 0.33; 'url:python': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'strange': 0.68 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=GOU0YGXdtO4FA3pzb6QMPgJzxUNfbwRW5nvjRubpB3U=; b=LOt66llkIKPAMdRfwJBu0t9PPSaFUU/mZ0pESvW0ROU3H0qQKY+5xcbvNynwYluRcf jiOloSFP4qCoGd2uQVaswP4VdoKFkVOaI4QMKW+3tQ8eiNJBotoU5dPnRUIGhDDTkQ0l FX3gjtfuf4NZx83KLQaBMt/U+x4NiBnCDOV0Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <400448ba-dacc-4220-a6d4-3f7709375c59@ft10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> References: <400448ba-dacc-4220-a6d4-3f7709375c59@ft10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> From: Ian Kelly Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:39:56 -0600 Subject: Re: total_ordering behaviour To: risboo6909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 9 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1311176428 news.xs4all.nl 23949 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33623 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9976 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:18 AM, risboo6909 wrote: > Hello all, > > I've noticed some strange behaviour of functools.total_ordering > decorator, at least it seems strange to me. Looks like this is already known and fixed as of March: http://bugs.python.org/issue10042