Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Continuing indentation
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:30:23 +1100
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <mailman.130.1456972240.20602.python-list@python.org>
References: <mailman.113.1456951421.20602.python-list@python.org> <0b33c10d-4366-49c7-8416-4d4ecd56ac8b@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmpTTsKTkV7XZ5tr-FyPFFRPG49Je6qjK-pce1Z7EwHsGw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.128.1456964447.20602.python-list@python.org> <56d79fcc$0$22141$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de REEZxjb5vEofOkdSiOaqGg2njf6ud4HidgbU7vA69mDA==
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TwWeM7YCY5JcvsK0+ydV1EFv0I4=
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.039
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'broken': 0.03; 'semantic': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'advocating': 0.16; 'bind': 0.16; 'expression.': 0.16; 'illusion': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'function': 0.28; 'that.': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'point': 0.33; 'clarify': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'smaller': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'progress': 0.38; 'names': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'great': 0.63; 'intent': 0.66; 'course.': 0.67; '_o__)': 0.84; 'complex,': 0.84; 'descriptive': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'western': 0.89; '\xe2\x80\x9cthe': 0.93; 'confirms': 0.95
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jigong.madmonks.org
X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35  4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
X-Post-From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:103927

Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> writes:

> If you only use "continue_playing" in exactly one place, then it
> doesn't deserve a name.

I disagree. If it's complex, then it may still deserve a name.

> > Names are important!
>
> Too important to waste on every single-use expression.

To waste on *every* single-use expression? Of course. No one was
advocating that.

The point is to bind a descriptive name to a *complex* expression, if
doing so will clarify the semantic intent of that expression.

If your functions are so long that you fear using a specific name will
deter you from using it again *in the same scope*, then the name isn't
descriptive and a better one should be chosen, or the function is too
large and should be broken into smaller pieces.

-- 
 \      “The history of Western science confirms the aphorism that the |
  `\     great menace to progress is not ignorance but the illusion of |
_o__)            knowledge.” —Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, 1914–2004 |
Ben Finney