Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'formatting': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'skip:{ 20': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.10; '>>>': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"new': 0.16; '(before': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'jan': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.21; 'string': 0.26; 'nested': 0.30; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'actual': 0.36; 'pretty': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'header :Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'john': 0.62; 'free': 0.63 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Dynamic Zero Padding. Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:56:42 -0400 References: <4DEEAECB.4070601@codicesoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <4DEEAECB.4070601@codicesoftware.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1307501817 news.xs4all.nl 49041 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:58358 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7209 On 6/7/2011 7:05 PM, John Posner wrote: > You might want to try "new style" string formatting [1], which I think > is better than the "old style" in this particular case: > > >>> "Testing {0:0{1}d}".format(42, 4) > 'Testing 0042' > >>> "Testing {0:0{1}d}".format(42, 9) > 'Testing 000000042' One cannot use a nested field in the 'name' part of the field (before the ':' (I tried), but are pretty free to nest in the actual specification part after the ':'. >>> '{0:{1}}'.format(7,'b') '111' >>> '{0:{1}}'.format(7,'d') '7' -- Terry Jan Reedy