Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #76170

Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.048
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'feasible.': 0.09; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.09; 'thread': 0.14; '&gt;&gt;': 0.16; 'block.': 0.16; 'blocking': 0.16; 'caller.': 0.16; 'coroutines': 0.16; 'executor': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'aug': 0.22; 'email addr:gmail.com&gt;': 0.22; 'putting': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'skip:e 30': 0.24; '&gt;': 0.26; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'needed.': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'critical': 0.32; 'run': 0.32; 'framework': 0.33; 'sense': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'done,': 0.36; 'yield': 0.36; 'tasks': 0.38; 'whatever': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'skip:& 20': 0.39; '12,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'ian': 0.60; 'course': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'holding': 0.65; 'apart': 0.72; 'protect': 0.79; 'asynchronous': 0.84; 'subject:Using': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=/bif5981Sq+Bb0fgBtLY/nZMWHQfDCRrpucgyEVleyE=; b=XJqxXrdB19vtkmq0Nl0p8Q093s8BiJrTc1fDy1c+swbUPgGJ4FXbRVDdzVKcyMu8pW ejMkMmMcewviW6u7eHTCY/s/dCpEfNEUhU+wskTBfjW4ZCM2mh6oWwsmwMtgs2CHG8Mc g6cU9Q6vhGummrTqyTFzlyKFUQziR7eS15JPy5ItajHtO0wH/kQ1xJOoXm1om033gnU6 evEBOTVWnSGXVP50R3X9a/jYWejZbYoGxIPvbYPlLwd73n2AJi/OTY4814U/Z/7vo5fd u5eXIFYVkXLKiTQ40yfQ54hvbnNvw019eRAcIMj1oAuhBlaku46P4JX1uICDd1o9FHd+ RR7Q==
X-Received by 10.70.102.175 with SMTP id fp15mr2250335pdb.52.1407909863041; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 23:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <8738d1dlru.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
References <d6e2ab63-c9bc-4271-abac-17e32afa4c88@googlegroups.com> <mailman.12901.1407879145.18130.python-list@python.org> <8738d1dlru.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:03:42 -0600
Subject Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2fce04330d605007c8f50
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.12908.1407909872.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 69
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1407909872 news.xs4all.nl 2862 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35787
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:76170

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote:
>
> Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> And that's it, no coroutines, no `yield from`. Since, if I understand
> >> correctly, asyncio requires a mainloop, it would make sense for the
> >> AsyncIOExecutor to have a thread of its own in which it could run its
> >> mainloop.
> >
> > I think that putting the event loop in a separate thread would be
> > necessary if the intention is that the executor be invoked from
> > outside. I'm not aware of this work having been done, but it sounds
> > perfectly feasible.
>
> Multithreading will require normal locking to protect critical sections.
> Care must be taken to never yield while holding a threading lock.

You can use event_loop.call_soon_threadsafe() to schedule tasks and
callbacks on the event loop, and Queue objects to pass futures back to the
caller. Apart from whatever synchronization those use internally, I don't
think any locking would be needed.

However, it would of course require that the "functions" passed in to the
executor be coroutines in actuality. You just can't pass a blocking
function into an asynchronous framework and expect it to magically not
block.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 10:02 -0700
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-12 21:31 +0300
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-08-12 19:43 +0100
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 15:31 -0600
    Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-13 08:03 +0300
      Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-13 00:03 -0600

csiph-web